Skip to content

Development of Modern-Day Hip Resurfacing

Information for healthcare professionals

Modern-day hip resurfacing is based on observations of patients with large diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip prostheses such as the McKee-Farrar and the Ring Hip (Figure 1), who retained functioning hips with very little wear for more than 30 years after their operation3.

Finsbury (now MatOrtho®) was involved in the development of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR), which was based on study of the successful devices and the application of modern manufacturing techniques. Since its first use in 1997, thousands of successful hip resurfacing procedures have been performed around the world. 

Figure 1

Figure 1: Historical MoM prosthesis: the Ring Hip implanted 1964–1979.

The ADEPT® Hip Resurfacing System was developed using the knowledge gained by direct involvement in the BHR and the extensive research of historical MoM devices, and as the original manufacturer of the BHR3, manufacturing over 200,000 BHR devices. The ADEPT® Hip Resurfacing was first used in 2004. 

The ADEPT® introduced a small number of advancements including consistent angle of coverage for all implant sizes, smaller increments between sizes and advanced instrumentation for its reliable implantation.

Figure 2

Figure 2: The ADEPT® Hip Resurfacing and in situ.

References

Resources

ADEPT® Clinical Rationale
ADEPT® Flyer
ADEPT® Operative Technique

Download Now

Fill in your details below to download the ADEPT® Clinical Rationale

Additional Text

Download Now

Fill in your details below to download the ADEPT® Flyer.

Additional Text

Download Now

Fill in your details below to download the ADEPT® Operative Technique

Benefits of Hip Resurfacing

The benefits of hip resurfacing include a viable treatment for younger, more active patients, early intervention, bone conserving procedure, more reliably restored native hip joint biomechanics4, lower infection rates5 , lower incidence of dislocation4,  improvements in activity levels and hip scores, particularly in younger patients4,6, and ease of femoral revision.